Rss

We Were Waiting

[3.5 minute read]

Where the magic happens. (Sometimes!)
From The Stratford Festival website.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ShowGirl and I got away to a little town in southwestern Ontario. It’s called Stratford, after The Bard Himself’s wee agricultural hub in England. Our Stratford also straddles an Avon River, but the place had been only a quiet nod to the old country before a group of, I would have to say, pretty wacky locals decided that with a name like that, their country town really should be THE North American Shakespearean Experience! Yeah! What a silly idea. And of course, now, the Stratford Festival actually is this magnificent thing. Dreams and dreamers.

My bride and I didn’t select A Midsummer Night’s Dream among the plays we would see this time. (We only fit in one Shakespeare blast, The Tempest. I dream of Dream-ing later in the season, but Stratford’s a fair hike from Ottawa.) But among the offerings was the American classic musical Guys and Dolls, one of the productions she sang/danced/supporting actor-ed in during her stint in the Company lo those many years ago, so that choice was obvious. My top priority was Waiting for Godot, the absurdist, existential Samuel Beckett play, the absolute antonym to Guys even though they both were first staged around 1950. High art versus tacky commerce? (My description.) Meaningless depression versus great songs and wonderful dancing? (ShowGirl’s — my bride’s — comparison.) From the sublime to the ridiculous? (Or vice versa.) Different strokes for different folks? (Clearly!)

No big brain-wrecking reviews today, though. Our family chat on Signal became the venue for a rapid-fire exchange, not only between ShowGirl and me, but also Son One and Grandma G (his mum).

JH: Sitting down to supper at a cool eatery, off to wait for Mr. Godot. [ShowGirl] is very

Vladimir and Estragon, Paul Gross and Tom McCamus. From the Festival site.

excited for all this existential waiting!

JH [later, at intermission of Waiting]: It’s astounding. [ShowGirl] has just left! The couple behind are leaving. People should know what they’re in for, but it’s standard in this run, at least so I hear, for the second-half audience to be substantially smaller than the first. This is in the big Festival Theatre, not some alt-venue. I am kind of stunned. This thing persists, but the play isn’t kind to us at all.

SG [walking back to the B&B]: I didn’t get the point of being with these men at all. Didn’t want to spend another minute with their absurdist conversation that made no sense to me!!!

Grandma G [a former actor and ever-lover of the theatre]: And that is the point. So glad to get it through someone else and not pay the ticket price.

SG: I think we should be paid to watch it, LOL!

GG: What a colossal mistake for the Festival

GG [the next morning]: I have a close friend who saw it, front row, on Broadway with Keanu Reeves. Stellar!

Son One: Good show. Dad, did you enjoy it?

JH: I did, though there was no joy infusion….I laughed out loud more than once, a victory of sorts. It *is* desperately funny in its way, and the production aims for that to a substantial degree. I got more inside the thing in act 2, the characters and their situations becoming more poignant and distinct. It is a strange and strangely powerful, enduring thing. Estragon was Tom McCamus, who played Willy in Salesman Saturday. [I had poached an extra dose of dour theatre by coercing a buddy to see Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, a play of similar vintage, a couple of days earlier.] What a double! The acting and the wordplay, even when I still felt outside Godot, was admirable and fascinating to me. I am still processing. I read the program, I pored over Wikipedia’s discussion while Diana slept, after our point-counterpoint post-game breakdown…

Yeah. Part of my remaining “outside” the thing was because of The Thing, but some of it was equivalent to critiquing the therapist during counselling, or mentally coaching the coach while the coach is trying to coach (have been guilty on both charges!!)—I was asking Why stage it here? and Who are all these resourced people? and What do they think they’re doing here? and Diana must hate this but she’s quiet and still seated! (But she fairly rocketed out of her seat when the intermission lights came up! That was a show in itself. Wow.)

GG: The friend was riveted by the Broadway performance. Godot is such a risk — when it loses folks or goes bad, it goes colossally so. Ugh. To me Waiting for Godot is kind of surprise therapy, forcing the audience into themselves and their personal waiting and pushing parts. Some of us are open or at least lulled into this breaking of the agreement between performance and personal space. Some of us, quite rightly, will leap up and say “WAIT A MINUTE! This is not what I came here for!”

JH [two nights later, at the Festival Theatre, responding to GG]: Yup, that was We Two.

“But the guys only doin’ it / For some doll…!”
Festival website

I have decided not to leave at the intermission for Guys and Dolls, though I had already play-acted my premature indignation at the play (inherent falsity, glorification of vulgar and immoral behaviour, the lustful American perversion of “love”, not to *mention* the strange and unnatural proclivity for characters to start singing Songs They Somehow Already Know in response to the merest hint of emotion or plot twist!) over breakfast this morning, so I should make it through. Especially since watching SG watching (and singing and seat-dancing the show) is an entertainment unto itself!

That was fun to remember.

Boys Will Be Men

In Arthur Miller’s grim masterpiece, Death of a Salesman, the stumbling Willy Loman careens downhill right in front of his two grown sons, one aimless and thieving, the other bent on whoring and cash. As “the only dream a man can have” disintegrates, Willy beseeches his sons, “Where are you guys? The woods are burnin’!” It’s a good question.  Where are the men?  I don’t know if they are still being moulded on the playing fields of Eton, but I’m having trouble finding them in my little acre.

The organizers of the Million Man March (now when was the last time you thought about that?) asked Willy’s question, lamenting the lostness they saw among African-American men. To their great credit (and that of the men) they found a lot of them, too, at least for a day. (1995. Whole different century.) Their concerns were not exclusive to the black community; their call was simply good and loud, and well-publicized, though it’s hard to hear now.  We are noticing, more and more – and should it come as a surprise? – that, in all cultures, both genders have been affected, afflicted, by the huge changes of the past century, and specifically by the struggle for equality between women and men. This should never have been a zero-sum game; women’s advancement should not require male retreat, but there are disturbing signals.

Every thoughtful gathering of men is filled with guys in search of their fathers. (So are tail-gate parties, but beer and burgers make it easy to forget.) Like an astonishing number of his professional peers, basketball icon Vince Carter was raised by his mother, with his father only a marginal and shadowy presence; it’s a story Sports Illustrated writes again and again. If you can stand the corrosive resentment, listen to Eminem. He flails viciously at his mother, but his departed dad scores at least as high on his rage meter. As an educator and father, I worry. I see men in retreat, especially the young ones.  Despite the advantages we still have (and let’s not whine about reduced opportunity; the corridors of commercial and political power are still dominated by the good ol’ White Male), we are leaving fields of honourable struggle in troops. The oppression of women remains a fact, but their emergence from it, at least in our part of the world, is an even stronger one. I’m afraid men are an endangered species.

I taught for a long time in a small-town high school.  Recently, of the top 9 students academically honoured in grades 9-11, one was male, and through the ‘90s and into this century the proportion of boys winning academic distinctions was rarely as high as 30%. The last time I counted, among our June graduates receiving awards, 79% were young women (and thank goodness for Paul, or the numbers would have been worse!) Of the dozen young people on the school’s “Wall of Fame” for outstanding extracurricular involvement, one has a Y chromosome, and our student leadership was routinely dominated by eager girls. My school was no exception. University spokespersons are wondering out loud where the lads are. It is young men in our schools who appear most in need of the loving arm, the encouraging smile, not to mention greater numbers.

In December, my students were always asked to think and write on the anniversary vigils in remembrance of the Montreal Massacre. (1989. Remember?) Fourteen shining female students were hunted in their university classrooms and slaughtered by a young man who blamed their success for his uselessness. This event was news to most of my students. It was sobering to them, but only because of its scale and, perhaps, because it couldn’t be dismissed as a “crazy American” aberration. And now there has been the Dawson College rampage in the same Canadian city. Men keep threatening, hurting, even killing women they claim to love when they find they can no longer keep or control them. These, of course, are the shocking extremes. More often, men just seethe in terminal frustration, or fade away. Legions of boys and young men, and more than a few midlife crisis managers, find that if life insists on a look inside their hearts, there is a smoking hole where a role model ought to be. What is a guy supposed to do?

A man yearns to be useful.  He needs a thing to work at. And yes, there are lots of toys – mechanical, electronic, chemical, female – to spend our hard-earned money and hormones on, not to mention being a slow-moving target for televised sport, World Wrestling Entertainment, record producers, porn kings, and the Hollywood hype machine. But we all know. All this “cannot fatten nor appease their thirst”, as the Teacher said, yet so many men, and most tragically the young ones, just can’t push themselves away from that all-you-can-eat banquet, or even realize that there is anywhere else to sit.

So I made the care and feeding of young men my specialty, teaching and coaching and prodding my four sons and their kind. Women trip and fall on this lurching, drunken planet, but they are building strength and vision and wisdom. They’re coming. They’re here, in every high school. I want to believe there will be enough good men brave enough to walk beside these bold and lovely ladies. It’s a big issue, but I suggest we start small. Take a man to lunch. Help a man across any metaphorical street you can. Let’s continue our work for the advancement of women, but don’t forget the boys!